ScienceResultsUpdatesApp
Navigation
ScienceResultsUpdatesApp

EFT Tapping Research Statistics: 30+ Peer-Reviewed Studies Summarised

A reference table of the peer-reviewed EFT tapping research, organised by topic. Every study links to its PubMed entry or journal page. We've included the design and sample size for each so you can judge weight at a glance.

Where the evidence is weaker or contested, we flag that explicitly. For deeper context on any single study, follow the link in the table to the source.

Anxiety

Strongest evidence domain. See our EFT for anxiety page for the long-form treatment.

StudyDesignnFinding
Clond 2016Meta-analysis (14 studies)658 totalLarge pre–post effect on anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = 1.23).
Feinstein 201911-clinic observational, 5.5-yearMulti-thousandSubstantial anxiety improvement in fewer sessions than typical CBT course.

PTSD and trauma

Multiple RCTs and a meta-analysis. The Church 2013 veterans finding (90% no longer meeting PTSD criteria) is one of the largest single-study effects in any psychological-treatment research. See EFT for PTSD.

StudyDesignnFinding
Karatzias 2011Head-to-head RCT (EFT vs EMDR)46Equivalent and significant improvements on PTSD outcomes in both arms.
Church 2013RCT (veterans, EFT vs waitlist)59 veterans90% of EFT participants no longer met PTSD criteria vs 4% in waitlist.
Sebastian & Nelms 2017Meta-analysis (7 RCTs)PTSD patients across studiesLarge effect size; authors concluded EFT meets evidence-based PTSD treatment criteria.
Church 2018RCT with gene-expression measurement53 veteransSignificant changes in expression of six stress-related genes after EFT for PTSD.

Cortisol and stress biomarkers

See cortisol page.

StudyDesignnFinding
Church 2012Three-arm RCT (EFT, supportive interview, rest)83Cortisol dropped 24% in EFT group vs 14% supportive interview, 0.6% rest.
Stapleton 2020Three-arm RCT (replication)53Cortisol dropped 43% in EFT group; significantly greater than control arms.
Bach 2019Pre–post physiological battery31 (full panel)Cortisol -37%, heart rate -8%, BP -6 to -8%, salivary IgA +113%.

Depression

Two meta-analyses, both with large effect sizes. See EFT for depression.

StudyDesignnFinding
Nelms & Castel 2016Meta-analysis (20 studies)859 totalLarge effect on depressive symptoms (Cohen's d = 1.31). Durable at 90+ days.
Vural Doğru & Utli 2024Meta-analysis (18 RCTs)RCT participantsReplication of Nelms & Castel with RCT-only filter; effect size 1.27.

Chronic pain

Smaller but consistent. See EFT for pain.

StudyDesignnFinding
Stapleton 2022 (chronic pain fMRI)Pre–post fMRI24Pain severity -21%, anxiety -37%; decreased connectivity in pain-modulating brain regions.

Phobias and fear

One of the foundational EFT research areas. See EFT for fear and phobias.

StudyDesignnFinding
Wells 2003RCT (EFT vs diaphragmatic breathing)35Significantly greater reduction in phobic anxiety on behavioural and self-report measures.
Salas 2011Within-subjects pilot22EFT reduced phobic anxiety more than diaphragmatic breathing comparison.

Food cravings and weight

The Stapleton team at Bond University drives this evidence base. See EFT for weight loss.

StudyDesignnFinding
Stapleton 2016 (Food for Thought)RCT (EFT vs waitlist)96Significant reductions in food cravings, dietary restraint; weight changes maintained at 12 months.

Sleep

Honest about limits — the Souilm 2022 trial actually favoured sleep hygiene over EFT for sleep quality in elderly adults. See EFT for sleep.

StudyDesignnFinding
Souilm 2022Open-label RCT (EFT vs sleep hygiene education)60 elderlyBoth groups improved; sleep hygiene reached 100% good sleep quality vs 73% for EFT.

Where the evidence is weakest

  • Vagus nerve and HRV claims. Plausible mechanism, no controlled trial with HRV as the primary outcome. See vagus nerve page.
  • "Calms the amygdala." No fMRI study has directly measured amygdala deactivation during EFT. See stress response page.
  • Money mindset, manifestation, abundance. No clinical evidence. We don't make claims here.

Independent replication is the next bar

A note on the field as a whole: many of the published EFT studies have been conducted by researchers in the EFT community. The direction is consistent across studies, but larger independent replications would strengthen the evidence base further. We watch for this and update accordingly.


Last reviewed: June 2026. We update this page when new peer-reviewed evidence is published.

Try evidence-based EFT yourself.

Coacalm guides you through clinical EFT with SUDS tracking before and after every session. 7-day free trial.

Download Coacalm
1.0
Pages
  • Science
  • Results
  • Updates
  • App
2.0
Learn
  • What is EFT tapping
  • How to do EFT
  • The 9 tapping points
  • EFT for anxiety
3.0
Follow
  • App Store
  • Press
  • Compare apps
  • Email
Privacy PolicyTerms of Use
United Kingdom